
Building an evangelical,
confessional Lutheran future in America.
Minneapolis
Area Synod Resolution 5, 2001
RESOLUTION
In Support of Churchwide Bylaw Change to Provide for "Ordination
in Unusual
Circumstances"
1
WHEREAS, the Minneapolis Area Synod 2000 Assembly
adopted RC2000-1 0, calling
for
2
Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America (ELCA)
churchwide constitutional
changes to allow for
3
alternate ordination
authority; and
4
WHEREAS, several
other synods adopted
resolutions with similar
intent; and
5
WHEREAS, the ELCA
Church Council, Division for
Ministry and Conference of
Bishops have
6
responded to these
actions with a recommended
change in churchwide bylaws;
and
7
WHEREAS, the proposed
bylaw responds to the
concerns expressed in last
year's action by assuring
8
ordinands that they
need not violate their
confessional subscription by
the very rite of ordination;
9 and
10
WHEREAS, the proposed
bylaw makes the decision to
allow ordination in unusual
circumstances a
11
pastoral one, after
consultation with the
presiding bishop and advice
from the Synod Council; and
12
WHEREAS, the proposed
bylaw is a reasonable
accommodation on a
church-dividing issue and a
13
sign that members of
the body of Christ can
listen to and appreciate
differences; therefore be it
14
RESOLVED, that the
2001 Assembly of the
Minneapolis Area Synod
commends the following
15
proposed churchwide
bylaw amendment to the
Minneapolis Area Synod 2001
Churchwide
16
Assembly voting
members and all other 2001
Churchwide Assembly voting
members:
17
7.31.17.
Ordination in unusual
circumstances.
18
For pastoral reasons
in unusual circumstances a
synodical bishop may provide
for
19
the ordination by
another pastor of the
Evangelical Lutheran Church
in America of
20
an approved candidate
who has received and
accepted a properly issued,
duly
21
attested letter of
call for the office of
ordained ministry. Prior to
authorization of
22
such an ordination,
the bishop of the synod of
the candidate's first call
shall consult
23
with the presiding
bishop as this church's
chief ecumenical officer and
shall seek the
24
advice of the Synod
Council. The pastoral
decision of the synod bishop
shall be in
25
accordance with
policy developed by the
Division for Ministry,
reviewed by the
26
Conference of Bishops
and adopted by the Church
Council.
27
And be it further
28
RESOLVED, that the
2001 Minneapolis Area Synod
in Assembly requests that
the bishop and Synod
29
Council apply this
proposed bylaw and the
policy referred to therein,
if adopted by the 2001
30
Churchwide Assembly,
with pastoral wisdom and
theological integrity.
Submitted
by: Minneapolis Area Synod
Council - April 5, 2001 Contact Person: Vice President Kari Christianson
(763-757-1666)
Author: Bishop David W Olson (612-870-3613)
Reference and Counsel forwards this resolution with
recommendation to adopt.
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
R(:2001-5
In Support of Churchwide Bylaw Change to Provide for "Ordination in
Unusual Circumstances"
When
Called to Common Mission was
adopted in 1999, many
objected to the requirement
and, by implication, the
necessity of ordination by a
bishop.
Included by amendment
in Denver was the word
"regularly." Thus,
"a bishop shall
regularly preside and
participate in the laying on
of hands at the ordination
of all clergy." (Para.
20) This is the basis for a
proposed by-law defining
regularly and a process for
exceptions to the rule.
Many
synods requested such
exceptions.
A by-law was proposed
by the ELCA Church Council
in November, 2000 in partial
response to a letter of the
March Conference of Bishops.
Procedures and
criteria were proposed by
the Division of Ministry
which would have been more
restrictive and set a time
limit, but these were
defeated by a near unanimous
vote of the bishops in March
of 2001.
The Division of
Ministry board then approved
suitable procedures and the
church council has
transmitted the proposed
by-law to the churchwide
assembly which will vote in
August.
In
practice, a candidate who
objected to this requirement
and the necessity of a
bishop presiding at
ordination Would state the
objection and give a
rationale to the bishop of
the synod into which he or
she has been called.
That bishop would
consult with the presiding
bishop about the ecumenical
implications (probably to
ascertain that there were
not so many exceptions as to
undermine the rule).
The bishop would also
obtain the advice of the
synod council.
Then the decision
would be the bishop's and it
is to be pastoral, that is,
for the sake of shepherding
his/her pastor and people.
Those
who obtain the exception
must as always have the
ordination authorized by a
bishop.
They will not be
listed separately.
Only if requested to
serve an Episcopal church
would the ordination record
of a pastor need to be
checked.
The Episcopal bishops
have stated that pastors so
ordained would not be
eligible to serve Episcopal
congregations, unless by
some additional ceremony,
but these persons are not
likely to wish to serve.
Members
on either end of the CCM
issue may object.
Those opposing CCM
will say it is not enough.
Those in favor of CCM
will say it violates our
commitment to the Episcopal
Church and allows too much
local control.
Amendments must pass
by 2/3 so the broad middle
of voting members must
support it and those on
either extreme should not
stand in the way of this
very effective compromise.
The
consequence of adopting this
resolution are two of
enormous significance:
1.
No candidate will be
denied ordination in the
ELCA because of CCM.
2.
It can be then said
that ordination by a bishop
in the ELCA is not a
necessity.
|